October 15, 2024

laborday 2016

Building the Future, Success Together

Optimistic framing increases responsible investment of investment professionals

Optimistic framing increases responsible investment of investment professionals
  • Mecklin, J (ed) At doom’s doorstep: It is 100 seconds to midnight. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. (2022).

  • Ayling, J. & Gunningham, N. Non-state governance and climate policy: The fossil fuel divestment movement. Clim. Policy 17, 131–149 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. & Dowlatabadi, H. Divest from the carbon bubble? Reviewing the implications and limitations of fossil fuel divestment for institutional investors. Rev. Econ. Finance 5(2), 59–80 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, P. et al. Why fossil fuel producer subsidies matter. Nature 578(7793), E1–E4 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggot, G., Verkuijl, C., van Asselt, H. & Lazarus, M. Curbing fossil fuel supply to achieve climate goals. Clim. Policy 20(8), 881–887 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. Top investment banks provide billions to expand fossil fuel industry. The Guardian, 13 October. (2019).

  • Carney, M., de Galhau, F. V., & Elderson, F. The financial sector must be at the heart of tackling climate change. The Guardian, (2019).

  • Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. Global Sustainable Investment Review 2020. (2021).

  • Delis, M. D., De Greiff, K., & Ongena, S. Being stranded with fossil fuel reserves? In Climate Policy Risk and the Pricing of Bank loans (September 10, 2019). EBRD Working Paper, (231). (2019).

  • Bergman, N. Impacts of the fossil fuel divestment movement: Effects on finance, policy and public discourse. Sustainability 10, 2529 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • EFAMA. Asset management in Europe. An overview of the asset management industry. In 13th Annual Review. (EFAMA, 2021).

  • Otto, I. M. et al. Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 2354–2365 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, H., Dobrescu, L. I., Newell, B. R., Ortmann, A. & Thorp, S. As easy as pie: How retirement savers use prescribed investment disclosures. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 121, 60–76 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufwenberg, M., Gächter, S. & Hennig-Schmidt, H. The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games Econ. Behav. 73(2), 459–478 (2011).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger, A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. & Perner, J. The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc. 78, 204–231 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinon, A. & Gambara, H. A meta-analytic review of framing effect: Risky, attribute, and goal framing. Psicothema 17, 325–331 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Y. C., Kemp, S. & Servátka, M. On the importance of context in sequential search. Southern Econ. J. 86, 1510–1530 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetzold, F. & Busch, T. Unleashing the powerful few: Sustainable investing behaviour of wealthy private investors. Organ. Environ. 27, 347–367 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini, A. & Menichetti, E. The impact of behavioural factors in the renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework and empirical findings. Energy Policy 40, 28–38 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenzalida, J., Van Ryzin, G. G. & Olsen, A. L. Are managers susceptible to framing effects? An experimental study of professional judgment of performance metrics. Int. Public Manag. J. 24(3), 314–329 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, K. B., Gummerum, M., Ganis, G., Howard, I. S. & Terbeck, S. Virtual morality in the helping professions: Simulated action and resilience. Br. J. Psychol. 109, 442–465 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, A. Framing bias in the interpretation of quality improvement data: Evidence from an experiment. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 8(5), 307–314 (2019).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilaj, H. The choice architecture of sustainable and responsible investment: Nudging investors toward ethical decision-making. J. Bus. Ethics 140(4), 743–753 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action (Harvard University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14(3), 137–158 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Servátka, M. How do experiments inform collective action research? In Research Agenda for New Institutional Economics (eds Ménard, C. & Shirley, M.) 260–268 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. The Psychology of Social Norms (Harper & Row, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri, C. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Cambridge University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. Social norms and economic theory. J. Econ. Perspect. 3(4), 99–117 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandori, M. Social norms and community enforcement. Rev. Econ. Stud. 59(1), 63–80 (1992).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Allcott, H. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95(9–10), 1082–1095 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Servátka, M. Separating reputation, social influence, and identification effects in a dictator game. Eur. Econ. Rev. 53, 197–209 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D., Chen, R. & Krupka, E. Rhetoric matters: A social norms explanation for the anomaly of framing. Games Econ. Behav. 116, 158–178 (2019).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58(6), 1015–1026 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharot, T. The optimism bias. Curr. Biol. 21(23), R941–R945 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaida, N. & Kaida, K. Positive associations of optimism–pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior. Qual. Life Res. 28, 3323–3332 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, N., Gifford, R., Milfont, T. L., Weeks, A. & Arnocky, S. Learned helplessness moderates the relationship between environmental concern and behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 55, 18–22 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. & Teasdale, J. D. Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 87, 49 (1978).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. & Influence, B. The Psychology of Persuasion Revised Edition (Harper Business, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. Deposition testimony and the surrogate witness: Evidence for a messenger effect in persuasion. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. (1983).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (Harper Colophon Books, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pornpitakpan, C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 34, 243–281 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., & Vlaev, I. Mindspace: influencing behaviour for public policy. (Institute for Government, 2010). https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf.

  • Peeters, W., Diependaele, L. & Sterckx, S. Moral disengagement and the motivational gap in climate change. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 22, 425–447 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, E. M. & Shariff, A. F. Climate change and moral judgement. Nat. Clim. Change 2(4), 243–247 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814–834 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. & Haidt, J. How (and where) does moral judgment work?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6(12), 517–523 (2002).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W. & Baumert, A. Immediate affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgement: An adaptation of the affect misattribution procedure. Cogn. Emot. 24(3), 522–535 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold, H., Kunkel, A., Mackenzie, I. G. & Filik, R. Online processing of moral transgressions: ERP evidence for spontaneous evaluation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 10(8), 1021–1029 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. Climate change, responsibility, and justice. Sci. Eng. Ethics 16(3), 431–445 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F. Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition 108, 353–380 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychol. Sci. 22(1), 34–38 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, K. L. & Humphrey, J. E. Socially responsible investment funds: Investor reaction to current and past returns. J. Banking Finance 32, 1850–1859 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanguard. Asset Allocation Report December Quarter. Retrieved February 2022 from: (2020).

  • Dimson, E., Marsh, P., & Staunton, M. Credit Suisse Research Institute. Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2021 Summary Edition. Retrieved February 2022 from: (2021).

  • Daugaard, D. Emerging new themes in environmental, social and governance investing: A systematic literature review. Account. Finance 60, 1501–1530 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S. & Bridges, M. W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 1063–1078 (1994).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackert, L. & Deaves, R. Behavioral Finance: Psychology, Decision-Making, and Markets (Cengage Learning, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottman, J., Kelemen, D. & Young, L. Hindering harm and preserving purity: How can moral psychology save the planet?. Philos. Compass 10, 134–144 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.